Transmission

Lower transmission cost by raising utilization before building the most expensive next line.

Clean power gets cheaper when states can move it across the grid faster. The transmission strategies here all focus on using existing corridors, existing interconnection, and storage more effectively before assuming the only answer is a brand-new line.

Strategy 4

Surplus interconnection at underused sites

The surplus interconnection paper shows how much clean energy can be deployed by using existing fossil interconnection rather than waiting for an entirely new queue position. That means faster deployment and less new transmission cost for the same clean buildout.

Why it matters: cheaper grid access lowers both the generation bill and the transmission bill.
Strategy 5

Reconductoring to double transfer capacity

WP343 finds that advanced conductors can cost-effectively double transmission capacity in existing rights-of-way and can meet more than 80% of the new interzonal transmission needed for a very high-clean-power system. The key affordability claim is simple: much of that expansion can come at around one-third the cost of building a new line.

Why it matters: reconductoring is the strongest single transmission-cost lever in the simulator.
Strategy 6

Strategic placement of storage to improve transmission utilization

Storage can move energy into hours when transmission headroom already exists. In the simulator, that means storage is not only a generation strategy. It is also a wires strategy because it helps states use existing transmission more intensely before expanding it.

Why it matters: together with surplus interconnection and reconductoring, this is how the tool gets to roughly 50% transmission-cost reduction ceilings.
Policy Tools

How states unlock transmission savings

Transmission affordability depends on disciplining the old “just build another line” reflex. The playbook instead pushes states to measure utilization, allow more flexible interconnection, and accelerate upgrades in corridors customers already paid for.

Utilization First

Require utilities to prove existing wires are being used well.

States can require grid-utilization metrics, annual reporting, and direct regulator review of whether storage, VPPs, and non-wires alternatives could defer new transmission and distribution capex.

Example: Virginia HB 434 / SB 621, Illinois SB 25, and California’s DIDF process.
Flexible Interconnection

Connect large loads faster only if they bring flexibility or their own capacity.

Flexible or curtailment-ready interconnection and bring-your-own-capacity structures can reduce queue delays and keep households from subsidizing large-load infrastructure.

Example: ERCOT’s Connect and Manage approach and Texas SB 6.
GETs and Reconductoring

Screen upgrades in existing rights-of-way before greenfield build.

States and regional planners can require reconductoring, advanced conductors, flow controls, and dynamic line rating to be evaluated explicitly before defaulting to a new line.

Example: CAISO-approved GETs projects, ERCOT reconductoring evaluation, and MISO reliability reconductoring.
Use In Simulator

Transmission levers matter most where new load and new clean generation are both growing.

Texas, New York, and California see the largest modeled value from transmission reuse because the clean-energy buildout needs more room on existing wires.